Family Therapy
When it comes to family therapy, there’s this idea that each person in a family impacts the whole family. Usually, this looks like individual family members taking on specific roles. I vividly recall taking on the role of “responsible older sibling” while my sister took on the role of “the baby.” These roles are not stagnant. Family members often shift their roles, sometimes “responsible older sibling” becomes “teenage rebel.” Sometimes these roles change based on situation. “The baby” may turn into “annoying younger sibling” when the parents aren’t around. Parents take on roles within the family unit, too. I’m thinking of the very common “fun parent” and “mean parent.” But there are many more.
When one person within the family unit changes the way they do things, the rest of the family unit pushes back. Think about how an older sibling’s behaviors change when a new baby comes into the family. The older child might want to be held or fed “like a baby” or even have some potty training regressions. They might “act out” and say things like “I hate the baby. Take him back!” Or they might go the opposite direction and try to parent the baby themselves. Change is hard.
I see this in familiy therapy when a parent begins to implement a new strategy for dealing with a child’s inappropriate behavior. I always warn the parent that “things will get worse before they get better.” I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard “We tried that, but it didn’t work.” Of course it didn’t work. The kid is used to things being a certain way, and trying to change the way things are is new territory and it can be pretty scary.
Let’s look at an example
Nine year old boy is refusing to do his homework, his chores, or even to take a bath. His parents have tried EVERYTHING! They’ve taken away his electronics, took him out of football, grounded him to his room for days, even stopped letting him play outside with friends. Nothing works. Then in a family therapy session their son’s new therapist suggests that they try a radical new approach of no more punishments. Clearly, this new therapist is a quack! The therapist politely suggests: what you’ve been doing hasn’t worked, so why not try something new?
So the therapist goes through the plan with the parents, helps the parents practice the new way of responding to the child when he’s refusing to do what he’s been asked to do, and vehemently reminds the parents that “things will get worse before they get better.” The parents have a conversation with Little Jonny and his older sister Susan and explain that things are not working and something has to change, so they will be trying this new parenting approach that Jonny’s therapist suggested. They explain to Jonny and Susan that they’re going to be using “logical consequences” whenever possible and talk about what that looks like.
Then, they begin. Like every other day, Jonny refuses to do his chore after dinner, but this time instead of sending Jonny to his room, Jonny’s dad says “Man, it’s too bad that you don’t want to do your chore tonight. I was hoping we could all watch the new Marvel movie tonight, but now that I’m doing my chores AND Jonny’s chores, we just won’t have time to watch it before bed.” Jonny does nothing, and his dad does both their chores. This continues for the rest of the week. Each day, Jonny’s parents express their disappointment and regret that Jonny didn’t do his chores because it means they have to do double chores. Susan watches Jonny refuse to do his chores and not get into trouble, and she keeps telling her parents how unfair it is that she has to do her chores but Jonny doesn’t.
The next week, Susan begins to refuse to do her chores. Again, the parents stick with the technique and simply tell Susan that they’re disappointed because now they have to do all the chores. The parents spend the entire evening cleaning up after dinner. They come into the next family therapy session ready to quit this technique. It’s clearly not working! The therapist reminds them that “things will get worse before they get better.” The parents agree to continue for two more weeks.
Over the weekend, the parents casually comment that they’re so glad that the house is clean. They take pride in keeping a clean home, but it’s too bad that they can’t invite friends over because they’re just too tired from all the chores they’ve been doing all week. The parents regretfully inform Susan and Jonny that they can’t take them to the mall or the park because they’ve got other things to catch up on that they didn’t have time to do during the week.
The next week, Susan does her chores. Jonny still refuses. The parents continue to express their disappointment and regret when he refuses. However, on Sunday Jonny announces to his parents and Susan that he is going to do his chores this week. The parents are shocked, but they very carefully say, in a casual way, “I think that sounds like a good idea” and “Sure, honey.”
Let’s explore this example
When the parents tell Jonny or Susan that they don’t have time to do one thing or another, they are very careful to say it in a very objective, matter-of-fact way without placing blame. This is very important because saying “I can’t shoot hoops with you tonight because Jonny didn’t do his chore” would likely make Jonny defensive which would make him even less likely to cooperate. Instead, they focus on showing the kids how important it is for everyone in the family to work together to keep the house clean and highlight the consequences of not working together. And Jonny reaches his decision to do his chores on his own.
This really does sound like a radical idea, but it works when done correctly. It does not work, however, when done incorrectly. I know from experience. It is very hard to keep blame out of your voice when telling your child that you can’t do something you really wanted to do because they didn’t do what they were supposed to do.
Notice how Susan pushed against the parents’ new way of doing things? At first she complained, then she also stopped doing her chore. This happens when kids experience something different. But they are usually pretty resilient and will pick up on the new way of doing things. Problems arise when the parents give up too soon or when one parent has trouble with things changing. Imagine in this scenario if Jonny’s parents stopped the intervention when Susan stopped doing her chores. What if Jonny’s dad was on board with the new techniques but Jonny’s mom was adamant that it would not work. Would the techniques introduced in Jonny’s family therapy sessions work in these situations? Probably not.
Let’s review
It’s easy to see this kind of resistance in this example of a hetero- nuclear family, but it exists in all family structures. Maybe someone in the family is recovering from addiction. Perhaps someone in the family is trying to overcome depression or anxiety. Maybe the parents are going through a separation or divorce. Orthere’s been a significant loss in the family. Whatever the circumstances, when one person within a family unit is making changes in their own lives, it can have an impact on the entire family.
Change is hard. It takes time and often meets resistence. However, change is possible with commitment and consistency. Family therapy provides the support the family needs to stick to these changes.
Ready to get started?
If teletherapy sounds like it might be right for you, please reach out to schedule your free fifteen-minute consultation by calling 662-200-4210 or clicking the “schedule an appointment” button.
Learn More